Scroll
The Delusioneers · Alberta Series · Forensic Document No. 1

Instrumental
Variance

Alberta separatism polling · September 2025 – April 2026 · A methodology record.

Eight polling firms. Eight months. The same electorate. Every dedicated Alberta survey produced a result between 23% and 31%. The numbers above 35% that dominated coverage were not from those surveys. They were products of the instrument — the sample used, the question asked, the scenario constructed. This is the forensic record.

13 Instruments reviewed
23–31% Dedicated AB survey band
47% Reported "Alberta" figure · n=133
9% List independence as top concern
Section 01 · The Crime

How a Number Travels
The 72-hour propagation chain · May 23–25, 2025

On May 16–18, 2025, Léger polled 1,537 Canadians nationally. The Alberta subsample was 133 people — unweighted. Watch what happened to that number over the next 72 hours.

The valid finding 55% of Canadians understand
Alberta separatism · n=1,537 ✓
The laundered figure 47% of Albertans support
separation · n=133 ⚠
The editorial claim Albertans "almost evenly
split" on independence ✕
Fabricated polling Invented firm. Invented
researcher. 57%. ✕✕
Stage 1 · Valid finding · CP wire · May 23–24, 2025

Four outlets ran the same Canadian Press wire. The headline finding — 55% of Canadians understand Alberta separatism — is correctly sourced to a national survey of 1,537. The story is methodologically sound at the national level. The subsample problem is what comes next.

Global News May 23, 2025
Global News headline: Over half of Canadians say they understand Alberta separatism
Headline finding correctly from national n=1,537. Notes "almost two-thirds don't want it to happen." Body mentions 70% of Albertans "understand" — this is still the national survey's Alberta sub-finding on comprehension, not support.
! The 47% Alberta support figure appears lower in this story. Watch for it in the Toronto Sun editorial (Stage 3).
✓ Headline valid — national finding, national sample
CTV News May 23, 2025
CTV headline: More than half of Canadians say they understand Alberta separatism
Same CP wire. Same valid national finding. Notes n=1,537, notes no margin of error for online survey. Does not lead with Alberta support figure.
✓ Correctly reported — national sample, no Alberta support figure misused
Edmonton Journal May 23, 2025
Edmonton Journal headline: More than half of Canadians say they understand Alberta separatism
CP wire again. Pull quote from Léger's Dallaire: "Is this really a hard level of support? At this time, probably not." The pollster's own caveat is in the story. Many readers will not reach it.
✓ Valid — pollster's own caveat included, though buried
National Post May 25, 2025
National Post headline: On Alberta separatism, just over half of Canadians say they understand the desire
Same wire, two days later. Subhead actively notes 62% opposed. Correctly frames as a national comprehension finding, not an Alberta support measurement.
✓ Valid — opposition figure foregrounded in subhead
Stage 2 · The laundering · Toronto Sun editorial · May 24, 2025

The Toronto Sun editorial board takes the same Léger survey and makes a claim the wire stories did not. The 47% Alberta subsample — 133 unweighted respondents — is presented as evidence that Albertans are "almost evenly split." The subsample size is not disclosed. The margin of error is not disclosed. The dedicated Alberta poll from the same firm one week earlier (n=1,000, 29%) is not mentioned.

Toronto Sun — Editorial Board May 24, 2025
Toronto Sun editorial: Time to take Alberta separatism seriously
"47% were in favour compared to 48% opposed"This is the Alberta subsample from a national survey. n=133 unweighted. Credibility interval ±8.5pp. A 48/47 split within ±8.5pp is statistically indistinguishable from any number between 38% and 56%.
Editorial conclusion: "Albertans almost evenly split"The dedicated Léger Alberta poll (n=1,000, May 9–12) found 29% support, 67% opposed. Not evenly split. Same firm. One week prior.
Cites n=1,537 as survey size — this is the national sampleThe Alberta-specific figure comes from 133 of those 1,537. The editorial presents the national n as if it validates the Alberta figure.
133 Alberta respondents
behind the 47% claim
±8.5pp credibility interval
not disclosed
29% dedicated AB poll
same firm, 7 days prior
⚠ Subsample presented as Alberta result — "almost evenly split" claim not supported by data
Stage 3 · Foreign amplification · American Wire / New American · May 23–24, 2025

The same 72-hour period produced US right-wing media coverage of Alberta separatism that cited no polling numbers at all — but built directly on the "moving toward secession" narrative the inflated figures had established. No methodology. No sample size. No caveat. The number had already done its work upstream.

American Wire May 23, 2025
American Wire: All aboard the Trump Train? Conservative Canadian province moves towards secession
Headline: "Conservative Canadian province moves towards secession"No polling cited. No sample size. No methodology. Built on downstream narrative from the inflated figures.
Lede: "reportedly itching to secede... perhaps even become a U.S. state"Mainstreet (Feb 2026, n=1,504): US economic union offer decreased support by 2pp. Albertans do not want to be an American state.
✕ No data cited — narrative laundering of inflated upstream figures
New American May 24, 2025
New American: Canada's Alberta Province Heading Toward Secession Referendum
Headline: "Heading Toward Secession Referendum"All dedicated Alberta polls: 23–31% support. Consistent majority opposed across every instrument.
Describes Carney as "globalist" and his government as "leftist". Frame imported wholesale. No Canadian polling cited.
✕ Foreign political media — no data, narrative amplification only
Stage 4 · Complete fabrication · CO24 · May 23, 2025

The endpoint of the distortion chain. CO24 cites a poll from "the Canadian Institute for Public Opinion (CIPO)" — a name with real historical roots as the defunct Canadian arm of the Gallup organization, last active decades ago. It did not conduct this survey. The lead researcher quoted, "Dr. Elaine Chong," does not appear in any polling registry or academic database. The survey is described as n=3,200 Canadians, April 28–May 15 — a sample size and field period that matches no published poll. The topline: 57%. The actual Léger figure from the same week: 55%, n=1,537. Whether this is deliberate fabrication or AI-generated content that hallucinated a plausible institutional name, the result is the same: a fake poll, published, indexed, and potentially cited downstream.

CO24 May 23, 2025
CO24: Alberta Separatism Poll 2025: Majority of Canadians Acknowledge Concerns
✕✕ Cites "Canadian Institute for Public Opinion (CIPO)"CIPO was the real name of Gallup Canada's historical Canadian arm — but it has been defunct for decades. It did not conduct this survey. Invoking a real but defunct institutional name is either deliberate fabrication or AI hallucination landing on a plausible-sounding name.
✕✕ Quotes "Dr. Elaine Chong, lead researcher at CIPO"No such person appears in any polling registry, academic database, or professional directory. The quote is fabricated.
✕✕ Reports 57% of Canadians acknowledge Alberta concerns, n=3,200, Apr 28–May 15 → The actual Léger figure: 55%, n=1,537, May 16–18. The 57% figure, the sample size, and the field dates all match no published survey. This is not a rounding error.
CIPO defunct Gallup
Canada arm —
did not run this poll
Dr. Chong not in any
professional
registry
57% / 3,200 matches no
published
survey
✕✕ Fabricated polling organization · fabricated researcher · fabricated number
72hours
In 72 hours, a valid national survey finding (55% of Canadians, n=1,537) became an editorial claim that Albertans are "almost evenly split" (47%, n=133 undisclosed), became foreign political narrative ("moving toward secession"), became a fabricated polling organization with an invented figure (57%, CIPO). At no point in this chain did the underlying dedicated Alberta poll number — 29%, from the same firm, one week earlier, n=1,000 — appear in any of these stories.
Contrast · Responsible engagement · Calgary Herald · May 24, 2025

Not every outlet amplified. Trevor Harrison's opinion piece in the Calgary Herald interrogated the political use of the data rather than the data itself — and arrived at the same conclusion the polling architecture makes visible: the numbers reflect a political instrument, not a constitutional preference.

Calgary Herald — Trevor W. Harrison, Opinion May 24, 2025
Calgary Herald opinion: Deciphering Danielle Smith's bows to separatism
Does not lead with a polling number. Leads with Smith's political behaviour: "subtly and not so subtly pushed for provincial independence." The poll is context, not the story.
Cites the poll as evidence of Smith's political strategy, not as evidence of separatist momentum: "Smith says she is giving Albertans the opportunity to vent their anger and frustration, much of which she herself has stoked."
Notes correctly: "Polls suggest that an outright vote on independence would be defeated." The majority-opposed finding is foregrounded. The subsample figure does not appear.
→ Responsible engagement — polling as political context, not as evidence of separatist momentum
Section 02 · The Framework

Signal vs. Noise

If the number is inside the band, it is a measurement. If it is outside the band, examine the instrument. Every dedicated Alberta survey conducted between September 2025 and April 2026 falls within the 23%–31% signal band. Every number above 35% is traceable to a specific methodological departure — a subsample, a modeled projection, a scenario construct. That departure is the variance. The instrument produced it.

Signal Band 23% – 31%
All dedicated Alberta surveys. Different firms, different methods, same band.
Conditional Zone 28% – 37%
Scenario-based questions. Pipeline failure, US union, western bloc. Policy levers, not sentiment.
Noise / Distortion 42% – 47%
National subsamples and modeled projections. Instrument failure, not Alberta opinion.
Section 02b · The House Effect

Two Trackers. Same Population. Different Story.

Léger and Pollara both ran dedicated Alberta surveys in the same January–April 2026 window. They used different question wording, different field periods, and produced systematically different numbers. Placed side by side against their own prior waves, the two series tell divergent stories about the same electorate — and the divergence is larger than any single poll's margin of error.

Léger dedicated Alberta surveys (n≈1,000 each)
Pollara dedicated Alberta surveys (n=1,000–3,200)
Signal band: 23–31% (all dedicated surveys)
Firm Field dates n Question type Result Movement vs. prior wave
· léger dedicated alberta series ·
Léger / Postmedia May 9–12, 2025 1,000 "Alberta becoming independent" — support/oppose 29% Baseline for series
Léger Jan 23–26, 2026 1,003 "Alberta should become an independent country" — 3-way choice 18% ↓ 11pp from May 2025
Léger Apr 3–6, 2026 1,003 "Support for independence" — same 3-way choice 23% ↑ 5pp from Jan 2026
· pollara dedicated alberta series ·
Pollara Oct 2024 Not published "Vote for or against separating" — referendum binary 20% From Pollara tracker
Pollara (western) Dec 5–20, 2025 ~1,000 AB of 3,800 "Vote for or against separating" — referendum binary 19% ↓ 1pp from Oct 2024
Pollara Mar 16–25, 2026 3,200 "Vote for or against separating" — referendum binary 27% ↑ 8pp in ~13 weeks — described as "5-year high"
· cross-firm context · same period ·
Research Co. Jan 4–6, 2026 703 "Alberta becoming independent from Canada" — support/oppose 31% ↑ 9pp from June 2023
Ipsos Jan 9–14, 2026 ~500 "Vote for province to begin process of separating" — yes/lean 29% Drops to 16% after stress-test
Angus Reid Feb 2–6, 2026 979 5-point spectrum including lean 29% Consistent with other dedicated surveys
Mainstreet Feb 10–12, 2026 1,504 "Independent country" — binary referendum, telephone IVR 30% Only telephone survey; consistent with online band
Abacus Feb 24–Mar 1, 2026 1,000 "Cease to be a province" — constitutional language 26% Lowest dedicated survey figure; constitutional framing
Léger dedicated AB · Jan → Apr 2026
18% → 23%
+5pp over 10 weeks · both inside signal band
Léger's own Alberta tracker shows a 5-point increase from January to April — real movement, but modest, and both figures sit inside the 23–31% dedicated survey band. The January figure (18%) is actually the lowest dedicated Alberta result in the current cycle.
Pollara dedicated AB · Dec 2025 → Mar 2026
19% → 27%
+8pp in ~13 weeks · described as "5-year high"
Pollara's tracker shows an 8-point jump in 13 weeks — driving the "5-year high" headline. But the same period, Léger's dedicated Alberta surveys show 18% and 23%. The Pollara March figure (27%) sits 4–9 points above both surrounding Léger figures. The "record" may be a house effect, not a sentiment shift.
Cross-check · salience vs. intent · both firms · same period

Léger's January 2026 survey found 18% want independence — and 58% are concerned about separatist movements gaining influence. Mainstreet's February 2026 survey found 30% referendum intent — and 9% list independence as their top concern. Two firms, two methods, same finding: the population that would vote to separate is consistently larger than the population that considers it a priority issue. The gap between referendum intent and issue salience is not noise. It is the structural signature of a protest vote.

Section 03 · The Mechanism

The Policy Lever

Separatism in Alberta is not an ideological position. It is a pressure instrument. The Mainstreet data (Feb 2026, n=1,504, telephone IVR) is the only survey that tested conditional scenarios empirically. The result: federal resource policy moves the number. American financial offers do not. Adjust the levers below to see what the data actually shows.

Referendum Intent 27% would vote to separate
vs.
Issue Salience 9% list it as top concern
Pipeline interference Federal resource policy · Mainstreet Q3 +3pp
0%
Carbon / emissions policy Regulatory constraint · estimated ±2pp
0%
US economic union offer Foreign inducement · Mainstreet Q2 −2pp
0%
Equalization reform Fiscal grievance · estimated ±1.5pp
0%
Move the sliders to see how grievance levels shift referendum intent within the documented band. Note that issue salience remains anchored at 9% regardless of political trigger — the gap between "what Albertans say to pollsters" and "what keeps them up at night" is not a policy variable. It is structural.
Section 04 · The Verdict

The Salience Stack

Mainstreet Research (Feb 10–12, 2026, n=1,504) asked Albertans to name their greatest issue of concern. The separation movement that polls at 30% referendum intent ranks ninth in issue salience at 9%. The ghost bar shows what "30% referendum intent" would look like if it were a real issue priority. It isn't. That gap is the piece.

Cost of Living
26%
Healthcare
22%
Crime
9%
Education
9%
Immigration
8%
Taxes / Deficits
8%
Threats to Freedoms
9%
Alberta Independence
30% referendum intent →
9%
0% 10% 20% 30%
Reading

The dashed outline is what 30% referendum intent would look like if it were a genuine top-priority issue. The solid bar is what Albertans actually reported when asked what concerns them most. The gap between those two bars is not apathy. It is the difference between a ballot posture and a lived priority. A movement where the majority of its own supporters rank it below crime, education, and immigration as a daily concern is not an independence movement. It is a pressure valve. The number exists to be cited, not acted on.

Section 05 · The Record

All Instruments · September 2025 – April 2026
Primary source record · Instrumental Variance

Primary source data for every poll reviewed. Field dates, sample sizes, and question wording confirmed from firm PDFs and press releases. Colour coding: green = dedicated Alberta survey, clean independence question; amber = conditional / scenario-based; red = subsample artifact or modeled projection.

Firm Field Dates AB Sample Question / Format Result Note
· dedicated alberta surveys · clean independence question ·
ThinkHQ
Self-commissioned
Sept 2025
n not published
Albertans only Clean
"If a referendum held tomorrow, separate or remain?" Mock ballot, binary.
23% Baseline for current cycle.
Léger / Postmedia
Postmedia
May 9–12, 2025
n=1,000 AB
Albertans only Clean
"Alberta becoming a country independent of Canada." Support/oppose scale.
29% Same firm asked national subsample 7 days later; produced 47%. CTV reported this correctly.
Research Co.
Self-commissioned
Jan 4–6, 2026
n=703 AB
Albertans only Clean
"Alberta becoming a country independent from Canada." Support/oppose. ±3.7pp.
31% 42% among 18–34. Up 9pp from June 2023.
Ipsos
Self-commissioned
Jan 9–14, 2026
~500 AB
AB + QC (national study) Clean (initial)
"Vote for province to begin process of separating." Yes/lean/no/lean. Initial ask before stress-test. ±5.4pp.
29% Drops to 16% after cost stress-test. Committed 55%, conditional 25%, symbolic 20% of yes voters.
Angus Reid
Self-commissioned
Feb 2–6, 2026
n=979 AB
Albertans only Clean
5-point spectrum: Definitely leave / Lean leave / Lean stay / Definitely stay / Undecided. ±3pp.
29% Only 8% "definitely leave." 21% lean leave.
Mainstreet
Self-commissioned
Feb 10–12, 2026
n=1,504 AB
Albertans only · telephone IVR Clean
"If a referendum held today on if Alberta should become an independent country, how would you vote?" Binary. ±2.5pp.
30% Only telephone survey in table. 9% list independence as top concern in same survey.
Abacus Data
Self-commissioned
Feb 20–25, 2026
n=1,000 AB
Albertans only Clean
"The Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada." Agree/disagree. Constitutional language.
26% Constitutional framing produces lowest dedicated-survey figure. "Rock solid majority opposed."
Pollara
Self-commissioned
Mar 16–25, 2026
n=3,200 AB
Albertans only · largest sample Clean
"If a referendum held tomorrow — vote for or against separating?" Binary, decided vote. ±1.7pp.
27% "5-year high." Tracker began Jan 2021. Not an all-time record.
· conditional / scenario-based · same surveys, different questions ·
Léger / Postmedia May 9–12, 2025
n=1,000 AB
Albertans only Scenario
"AB, SK, BC, MB forming an independent country." Multi-province western bloc scenario. Same survey as 29% row.
35% Different question, same survey. Western bloc — not Alberta independence. Often unreported separately.
Mainstreet Feb 10–12, 2026
n=1,504 AB
Albertans only Scenario
"If US promised economic union + dollar-parity exchange, how would you vote?" US annexation scenario.
28% −2pp from clean question. US financial offer suppresses support. APP's Washington pitch does not move Albertans.
Mainstreet Feb 10–12, 2026
n=1,504 AB
Albertans only Scenario
"If proposed pipeline agreement between Smith and Carney fell apart, how would you vote?"
33% +3pp from clean question. Federal resource policy failure is the lever. Highest conditional figure.
· numbers above 35% · instrument failures ·
Léger / Canadian Press May 16–18, 2025
n=133 unweighted
n=171 weighted
National survey
AB subsample only
Subsample
"Support or oppose Alberta becoming a country independent of Canada." Asked in national survey. True AB credibility interval: ±8.5pp.
47% Reported as "almost half of Albertans" — subsample size not disclosed. Same firm, 7 days earlier, n=1,000: 29%.
Pollara Mar 16–25, 2026
n=2,576 (remain only)
Non-separatists only Projection
"Even if I don't want to separate, I'd consider voting to separate to send a message to Ottawa." Agree/disagree. Projected to full sample assuming 100% follow-through.
42% Not a poll result. Modeled figure: 27% decided + 15% protest-vote agreement. Reported in key findings alongside 27% without methodological distinction.
Instrumental
Variance
The variance is in the instrument.
The instrument is in the record.
——
All data from primary polling PDFs and firm press releases.
Léger AB subsample: Special Report PDF, May 20, 2025 (n=133 unweighted).
Léger Jan 2026: Government of Alberta Report Card, fielded Jan 23–26, 2026.
Léger Apr 2026: Government of Alberta Report Card, fielded Apr 3–6, 2026.
Mainstreet: telephone IVR, Feb 10–12, 2026, ±2.5pp.
Ipsos: Confederation Stress Test, Jan 9–14, 2026.
——
thedelusioneers.substack.com · @the_delusioneers
No returns. No refunds. No records.

Primary sources: ThinkHQ Alberta Separation Survey, Sept 2025 · Léger/Postmedia Alberta Separatism PDF May 14 2025 (leger360.com) · Léger Special Report May 20 2025 — Trust in Government and Provincial Sovereignty (leger360.com) · Research Co. Alberta Separation Jan 8 2026 (researchco.ca) · Ipsos Confederation Stress Test Media Release Jan 25 2026 (ipsos.com) · Angus Reid Alberta Independence Feb 9 2026 (angusreid.org) · Mainstreet Research Alberta Feb 10–12 2026 (mainstreetresearch.ca) · Abacus Data Alberta Sovereignty Feb 2026 (abacusdata.ca) · Pollara Alberta Spotlight Apr 2026 (pollara.com) · AFP Fact Check "Invented graphic flips poll results on Alberta independence" Feb 2026